Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Policy & Regulation News

EHR Incentive Program Deadline Rapidly Approaching

By Ryan Mcaskill

The deadline for providers to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program is February 28.

- The healthcare industry is just about one month away from the February 28 Eligible Professional attestation Medicare EHR Incentive Program deadline. This is a yearly incentive where physicians, hospitals and critical access hospitals to show that they have adopted, implemented or upgraded their systems and can demonstrate the meaning use and certified EHR technology. Currently, the industry is in the middle of the 90-day reporting period where they must “attest” that they used a certified EHR and meet Stage 1 criteria for meaningful use objects and clinical quality measures.

There are two different EHR Incentive Programs, one for Medicare that the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services is in-charge of and one for Medicaid which is run by individual state agencies. The two programs are similar but do have a few key differences.

The Medicare program has a maximum incentive of $44,000 that can be paid out over five consecutive years. Payment adjustments started at the beginning of 2015 for eligible parties that did not participate. Providers are also required to demonstrate meaningful use every year to receive the incentive payments. Eligible providers have until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on February 28 to attest any time to 2014 data.

The Medicaid program has a maximum incentive of $63,750 that can be paid out over six years which do not have to be consecutive. Eligible providers that choose not to participate are not subject to payment adjustments. Furthermore, in the first year, providers can receive an incentive payment for adopting, implementing or upgrading EHR technology. Regardless, providers must demonstrate meaningful use in the remaining years to receive incentive payments.

  • Diagnosis Code Confusion Leads to Medical Billing Errors
  • 5 Revenue Cycle Trends for ASCs, Ambulatory Practices
  • GOP Doctors Caucus Suggests MACRA Implementation Changes
  • CMS Calls On Rural Hospitals to Join Alternative Payment Model
  • Medicaid Acceptance, Payment Rates Both on the Decline
  • How Do Hospitals Impact the Economy?
  • New Study Examines Payment Model Best Practices
  • CMS Approves Outpatient Ambulatory Patient Experience Survey
  • EHR to Create $78B in Cost Savings Over Next Five Years
  • Various Forms of Fraud Hurting Hospital Revenue
  • Looking Back on 50 Years of Medicare and Medicaid
  • 29% of Healthcare Payments Under Alternative Payment Models
  • CMS to Require Healthcare Price Transparency Online for Hospitals
  • 5 Ways to Increase Hospital Profitability, Aid Revenue Cycle
  • Senator Urges FTC to Investigate Hospital Contracting Practices
  • EHR Incentive Payments, Medicare Payment Adjustments in Brief
  • NH Postpones Medicaid Managed Care Implementation
  • Turnkey Approach to Fighting Healthcare Fraud, Waste, Abuse
  • CMS Shares Open Payments Data to Boost Healthcare Transparency
  • CMS’s Quality Measurement Development Plan Supports MIPS, APM
  • Mass. Healthcare Payment Transparency Law Takes Effect
  • Burwell Addresses King v. Burwell: ‘Seize This Opportunity’
  • Prescription Drug Rate Growth to Slow in 2019, Increasing 4.92%
  • Limited Healthcare Payment Incentives Challenge Care Management
  • Employers Play Bigger Role in Value-Based Reimbursement Transition
  • ICD-10 Implementation Ran Smoother than Originally Expected
  • New Reporting, Shared Losses Rules for MSSP ACOs in Disaster Areas
  • Healthcare Supply Chain Issues Cause VA Center Director Change
  • More Primary Care Leads to Less End-of-Life Medicare Spending
  • How the Affordable Care Act Refines Revenue Cycle Management
  • Medical Billing Company Pays $1.95M in Fraud Settlement
  • Can Providers Make Patient Payment Collections Less Painful?
  • Driven by Specialists, Physician Compensation Rates Rise 3.1%
  • Does the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Undervalue Primary Care?
  • Healthcare Financial Challenges High for Hospital Executives
  • Why Revenue Cycle Must Evolve with Healthcare
  • CMS Awards $110M in ACA Funds to Cut Avoidable Readmissions
  • Industry Orgs Express Concerns with Healthcare Price Transparency
  • Provider Collaboratives Combat Healthcare Merger Pressures
  • Health Insurance Exchange Tips for Taxpayers Before April 15
  • Healthcare Merger and Acquisition Deal Value Dips in Q3 2018
  • Moving Past the “Model Hospital” with Revenue Cycle Management
  • VA Gives RNs Full Practice Authority to Improve Care Access
  • Value-Based Care Analytics Help Cut Healthcare Costs in Utah
  • Net Medicare Improper Payment Recoveries Dropped 91% in 2015
  • CMS Aims to Protect Medicaid Payments to Providers, Not 3rd Parties
  • Do Oncology Bundled Payments Promote Low-Value Drug Use?
  • Geisinger Lowers Turnover for Healthcare Revenue Cycle Success
  • Judge Calls for Medicare Appeals Backlog Elimination by 2020
  • Providers Skeptical Practice Variation Reduction Will Lower Costs
  • AMA Says Health Insurance Market Competition Lowers Premiums
  • MA Medicaid Proposes $1.5B Investment in Accountable Care
  • NPs, PAs, and Lay Workers Address Physician Shortage, Reduce Costs
  • March 26: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • 41% of Providers, Payers Adopt Value-Based Care Reimbursement
  • Bundled Hospital Care Payments: Remodeling a Broken System
  • CMS Proposes Changes to ACO Medicare Shared Savings Program
  • Role of CIO Increases Importance as Healthcare Embraces Digital
  • Why Is Medicaid Expansion a Win for Healthcare Providers?
  • Value-Based Incentives Top Practice in Reimbursement Model
  • Pentagon Slashes Autism Healthcare Payments
  • Third MI Provider Convicted in $17.1M Healthcare Fraud Case
  • Newly Launched MACRA Initiative Aims to Support Providers
  • January 30: The Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Legality
  • Healthcare Disruption Spurs Hospitals to Alter Business Operations
  • The Affordable Care Act’s Effect on Hospital Charity Care
  • Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant Salary Grew in 2016
  • Hospital Claims $173,000 in Medicare Overpayments
  • Medical Billing Codes Do Not Address Full Scope of Primary Care
  • Providers Spend $15.4B to Report on Healthcare Quality Measures
  • Preventable Readmissions Cost CMS $17 Billion
  • Next Generation ACOs Save Medicare $62M, Maintain Care Quality
  • May 15: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Looking Beyond Price in the Healthcare Supply Chain to Add Value
  • Transforming the Hospital Laboratory into a Profit Center
  • CMS Extends Home Health Enrollment Suspension to Combat Fraud
  • GAO: Millions Spent Yearly on Ineligible Medicaid Reimbursements
  • Consumers Favor Patient Financial Responsibility Loan Programs
  • Medical Liability Immunity Reduces Defensive Medicine, Costs by 5%
  • Long-Term Healthcare Spending Doesn’t Aid Heart Attack Survival
  • Sutter Health Destroys Evidence for Case on High Healthcare Prices
  • Hospital Profitability Down for 27 Percent of PA Facilities
  • November 13: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Billing Errors Lead to $1.7 Million in Medicare Overpayments
  • AMGA: Slow Encounter Data Transition in Medicare Reimbursement
  • Next Generation Accountable Care Organizations Save $164M
  • Hospitals Seek Independent Docs for Referrals, Healthcare Revenue
  • ACA Adds Billions in Bureaucratic Waste, Administrative Costs
  • MACRA Implementation, Healthcare Consumerism Trends at HIMSS17
  • Hospital Execs Look to Operations to Control Healthcare Costs
  • Navicure Survey Shows ICD-10 Transition Financial Challenges
  • Bundled Payments Program Extended to Improve Value-Based Care
  • CMS Announces Pre-Claims Reimbursement Review for Home Health
  • Top 4 Claims Denial Management Challenges Impacting Revenue
  • King v. Burwell Opposition Means 9.3 Million Lose Subsidies
  • AMGA Suggests CMS Improve ACOs, Medicare Shared Savings Program
  • Free Health Clinics Face ROI, Clinical Efficiency Obstacles
  • Recapping Finalized 2015 Rules from CMS on Medicare Payments
  • Nebraska Receives $268K in Excess Federal Reimbursement
  • New York State Agency Made $79K in Inappropriate Medicaid Claims
  • There are some caveats to the payment adjustments for Medicare eligible professionals. The 2015 adjustment started on January 1 for any provider that did not successfully demonstrate meaningful use in 2013 (for long-time participants of the program), 2014 (for first timers) or have not received a 2015 hardship exception.

    For providers that are not able to demonstrate meaningful use by the deadline or do not receive the 2016 hardship exception (the application process is already live) will have the payment adjustment applied January 1, 2016. Providers that are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid incentives, only need to prove meaningful use under one program to avoid the payment adjustment.

    It is possible that any incentive payment through these programs could be reduced through a sequestration, as required by the Budget Control Act of 2011. Under these reductions, eligible professionals and hospitals will be reduced by 2 percent.

    There is a large list of eligible professionals on the CMS website, and in some instances, a provider can be eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs.



    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...