Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Policy & Regulation News

Healthcare Practices Fear ICD-10 Reimbursement Code Denials

By Jacqueline DiChiara

- With nearly one week remaining until ICD-10 implementation becomes a reality, are healthcare organizations’ ICD-10 strategies, attitudes, and efforts on track for revenue cycle success? According to a recent national Navicure/Porter Research survey of billing managers, practice executives, and billers and coders, the fear of reimbursement disaster due to ICD-10 coding dilemmas is a major anticipated hindrance affecting current preparation levels and suppressing positive outlooks.

ICD-10 claims disruption implementation

Almost all survey participants (94 percent) expect their denial rates will increase in approximately one week’s time. But only 30 percent claim they have effectively worked to improve denial management processes to ensure a seamless post-ICD-10 transition. The question remains: is ICD-10 revenue cycle optimism a matter of merely putting your head in the sand?

Research additionally confirms 1 in 3 healthcare organizations have not made changes to their revenue cycle as part of ICD-10 preparation efforts. “While some organizations are being proactive in other areas to improve revenue and cash flow, including improving patient collections (34%) and patient price estimation (17%),” confirms Navicure/Porter research, “35 percent have not adjusted their revenue cycle in preparation for ICD-10."

ICD-10 optimism nonetheless resonates among the majority of survey respondents — a reported 85 percent, in fact. However, regarding more “concerning” news, 57 percent state they “aren’t necessarily on track yet.” Nonetheless, 43 percent of healthcare organizations “are on track for implementation,” nearly double from a survey conducted earlier this year.

  • 12 Value-Based Reimbursement Strategies to Cut Revenue Risk
  • April Sees an Influx of New Medicare Fraud Charges
  • Summary of CMS’s Top 5 Proposed Payment Rules, Revisions
  • How to Prepare for Alternative Payment Model Implementation
  • Hospital Cost Shifting Still Occurring in CO Despite Coverage Gains
  • Revenue Cycle Management a Post-ICD-10 Implementation Focus
  • Anthem Accountable Care Organizations Save $14.8 Million
  • NAMD Pens Medicare Part B Letter Urging Congress to Act Now
  • White House Proposes $845B in Medicare Spending Cuts
  • CMS Moves Medicare Payments for Skilled Nursing Facilities to Value
  • AHA Endorses Quality Reporting Software for Value-Based Care
  • Impact of Healthcare Subsidies Case Could be Substantial
  • GAO: Backlog Persists for Claims Reimbursement Appeal Process
  • Healthcare IT Funding Surpassed $7B in 2014
  • How Physician Shortages Are Transforming Healthcare’s Future
  • Do Pay-for-Performance Programs Improve Patient Outcomes?
  • Preventable Readmissions Drop Under Value-Based Care Model
  • 3 Key Strategies to Increase Healthcare Revenue Cycle Efficiency
  • CMS Creating Advisory Panel for Clinical Lab Tests
  • History of Value-Based, Accountable Care Models at CMS
  • CMS Audit Finds $17.6M Overstated for Excess Plan
  • Hospitals Seek Non-Acute, Supplier Partners for Value-Based Care
  • OIG: NJ Agency Falsely Claimed $95M in Medicaid Reimbursement
  • No Health IT Workforce Exec for Over Half of Non-Acute Providers
  • Payment Reform Strengthens Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • Examining Revenue Cycle Management Ethics Questions
  • 4,000 Healthcare Providers Receive $54M for HEDIS Excellence
  • GAO Reports Inadequate CMS Federal Exchange Coverage Control
  • MGMA: Healthcare Facility Operations Spending Grows By 12%
  • 80% of Hospitals Vetting Full Revenue Cycle Management Outsourcing
  • Value-Based Contracts with Risk 3 to 5 Years Away for Providers
  • OIG Testimonies Examine 340B Savings and Medicare Fraud
  • HHS Overstepped Authority with 340B Reimbursement Cuts, Judge Rules
  • Is King v. Burwell a ‘Downward Death Spiral’ for Revenue?
  • New Rules for Bundled Payment Models for Cardiac, Hip Care
  • 29% of Healthcare Payments Under Alternative Payment Models
  • 21% of Orgs Do Not Have a Hospital Bad Debt Recovery Process
  • How CMS Improves Primary Care Payments Through Codes, APMs
  • CMS, AMA Outline Evolving Healthcare Market Opportunities
  • April 10: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Premier: Bundled Payment Models Should be Voluntary Nationwide
  • Surveys Reveal MACRA Implementation, QPP Knowledge Lacking
  • Provider Engagement Key to Accountable Care Organization Success
  • Patient Education Boosts Revenue, Quality for Joint Replacements
  • Healthcare Payment Integrity is Vital to Maximizing Reimbursements
  • CMS Approves Outpatient Ambulatory Patient Experience Survey
  • HHS Distributes $36.3M in Affordable Care Act Funding
  • AHA Finds Flaws with the Patient-Driven Payment Model for SNFs
  • Cloud-Based Healthcare Supply Chain Management Drives Market
  • Target Prices to Control Prescription Drug Spending, AHA Advises
  • CMS to Help Medicaid Reimburse for Maternal Opioid Misuse Care
  • Breaking Down the Top 5 Healthcare Revenue Cycle KPIs
  • NH Judge Rejects CMS FAQs Clarifying Medicaid DSH Payments
  • Healthcare Merger, Acquisition Activity to Rise Despite Slow Q3
  • How to Manage ICD-10 Implementation Updates, Maximize Revenue
  • CMS to Extend Healthcare Price Transparency to Prescription Drugs
  • Hospitals Turning to Staff Buyouts to Reduce Healthcare Costs
  • PCP Awareness of Healthcare Costs Cuts Low-Value Resource Use
  • Role of CIO Increases Importance as Healthcare Embraces Digital
  • CMS Proposes Rule Changes for Accountable Care Organizations
  • HCTTF Helps Providers Find Value-Based Purchasing Partnerships
  • CMS Paid $4M in Excess GME Medicare Reimbursement, OIG Finds
  • Healthcare Payer, Provider Paradigm is Starting to Shift
  • GAO: Quality Measure Misalignment Impedes Provider Improvement
  • Relaxing Scope of Practice Laws for APRNs, PAs to Boost Efficiency
  • Adjustments Needed to Improve Qualified VA Nurse Staffing
  • Providers Praise E/M Documentation Changes, Oppose Payment Plans
  • Accountable Care Organizations Renew Hospital Reimbursement
  • AHA Issues ICD-10 Homestretch Checklist for Hospital Leaders
  • Ex-Hospital CEO, Doctors Guilty of $400M in Medicare Fraud
  • CMS Details How to Resolve ICD-10 Implementation Issues
  • Value-Based Reimbursement May Not Bring Benefits for SNF Care
  • AMGA Voices Concerns Over Cardiac Care Bundled Payments Model
  • Pennsylvania Plans for Medicaid Expansion
  • How the Affordable Care Act Refines Revenue Cycle Management
  • Why Accountable Care Organizations Need Revenue Cycle Risk
  • HHS Announces Timetable, Goals for Value-Based Payments
  • Hospitals Weigh in on Medicare DSH Payment Supreme Court Case
  • Credit Card On File Program Key To Patient Collections Success
  • How Can the Affordable Care Act Improve on Women’s Healthcare?
  • ACOs Restructure Healthcare Staffing for High-Risk Patients
  • More parents uninsured in states lacking Medicaid expansion
  • $350M Kickback Fine Can’t Derail Future of Dialysis Provider
  • Next Generation Accountable Care Organizations Save $164M
  • Freestanding Emergency Departments Cost 22 Times More Than Doctor
  • How Can Practices Improve Claims Management, Reimbursement?
  • Sept. 4: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Hospitals Face Healthcare Employment Challenges, High Turnover
  • How Provider Interaction Reduces Claims Reimbursement Waste
  • Choosing Wisely Slow to Reduce Low-Value Care, Resource Use
  • HHS Announces $840M initiative to Lower Costs and Improve Care
  • CMS Administrator Slavitt Writes ICD-10 Letter to Providers
  • Physician Shortage Projected to Grow to 104K Providers by 2030
  • How Illinois Medicaid Reduced Costs, Improved Care
  • Payment Reform Incentives Influence Physician Decision-Making
  • HHS Proposes Rule Endorsing Nondiscriminatory Gender Equity
  • Despite ACA, Emergency Department Visits Remain Numerous
  • CMS to Require Healthcare Price Transparency Online for Hospitals
  • Healthcare Employment Shifting to Hospital-Employed Providers
  • HHS to Clear Medicare Appeals Backlog by 2022, Court Docs Show
  • Although healthcare organizations confirm ICD-10 readiness levels are greater than before, as RevCycleIntelligence.com reported, an earlier Navicure survey stated that nearly sixty percent of physician practices confirmed their greatest ICD-10’s concern is a possible negative future influence on cash flow and revenue.

    Recent research additionally confirms those “proactive organizations” say they have prepared their revenue cycle to maintain cash flow consistency once ICD-10 implementation strikes by:

    • Improving patient collections (34%)
    • Improving denial management process (30%)
    • Testing early with payers (19%)
    • Improving patient price estimation (17%)

    What might ICD-10’s greatest challenges be once October 1 hits? Healthcare organizations confirm the following top two fears:

    • Increased clinical documentation update and coding requirements (31 percent)
    • Lack of payer preparation resulting in payment disruption (27 percent)

    Despite such tangible trepidations, 46 percent of respondents estimate upcoming ICD-10 financial losses of less than 20 percent. Additionally, 80 percent of respondents anticipate productivity loss; 2 in 10 respondents do not expect any loss in productivity. Sixty-one percent say they expect their denial rate to increase anywhere from 11 percent to 40 percent. 

    Additionally, it is only the minority of healthcare organizations participating in end-to-end testing experiencing overall positive results, confirms the research. A​s RevCycleIntelligence.com reported, nearly 90 percent of 29,000 test claims were accepted on behalf of the Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) testing from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

    Navicure and Porter Research confirm it is not too late to prepare for the transition to ICD-10. Accretion of efforts is imperative for readiness come October, they claim. Researchers conclude with the advice to consider ICD-10 as much more than just an annual coding or technology advancement.

    X

    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy


    no, thanks

    Continue to site...