Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Policy & Regulation News

ICD-10 Implementation Ran Smoother than Originally Expected

ICD-10 implementation costs were in line with expectations, testing improved, and productivity was not hurt, WEDI found in its latest survey.

By Catherine Sampson

- On May 9, the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI), announced that the ICD-10 implementation process was moderately smooth because costs were mostly in line with expectations and testing improved. Additionally, productivity levels did not appear to be impacted significantly, a press release revealed.  

Providers found ICD-10 implementation to be smooth because productivity levels were not hurt.

“WEDI has played a tremendous role in educating the industry and helping to best ease the impacts of the ICD-10 transition for many years,” said Jean Narcisi, chair of WEDI. “We wanted this post-implementation survey to be a closing chapter of assessment on why the transition went so well overall and to also leverage specific lessons learned for future large implementations.”

WEDI drew its conclusions from a post-ICD-10 implementation survey conducted in March 2016, which was five months after the code set was implemented. The organization interviewed providers, vendors and health plans.

The survey specifically examined the impacts of delays in ICD-10 implementation. Although changes to the compliance date increased costs for many providers, vendors and health plans, all sectors still said that the delays actually helped improve testing. As a result, the transition to ICD-10 was smoother than some organizations had previously anticipated.

  • Burwell: ACA Progress Caused Record Drop in Uninsured Rate
  • 5 Revenue Cycle Trends for ASCs, Ambulatory Practices
  • Healthcare Practices Fear ICD-10 Reimbursement Code Denials
  • CMS Extends $3B Medicaid Eligibility and Enrollment Funding
  • AHA Calls for Bundled Payments Delay, Reform for BPCI Advanced
  • Large Hospitals Fare Worse in Value-Based Reimbursement Model
  • Post-Acute, At-Home Care Saves Next Gen ACO Atrius Health $19.9M
  • House Bill Plans 2-Year ICD-10 ‘Grace Period’ Without Denials
  • Dissecting Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Reporting
  • AMA Calls for Massive Overhaul of RAC Program
  • How High Performing Practices Focus on Revenue Cycle Management
  • Revenue Cycle Management as Return on Investment
  • Value-Based Reimbursement Spurs 8% Hospital Merger Growth
  • April 17: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • HHS: Medicare Part B Premiums, Deductibles Staying the Same
  • A Holistic View of the Patient Enables Risk-Based ACO Success
  • Value-Based Reimbursement May Not Bring Benefits for SNF Care
  • Can Cost Sharing Models Improve Medicare Spending Issues?
  • April 10: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Falling Productivity Stifles Physician Compensation Boost in 2017
  • CMS Paid $4M in Excess GME Medicare Reimbursement, OIG Finds
  • RCCH Uses Predictive Analytics to Boost Claim Denials Management
  • Physician Shortage Drives Boost in Nursing, Physician Assistant Pay
  • $628K Awarded to Boost US Healthcare Spending Research
  • AHA Calls for Value-Based Reimbursement Reform Under Trump
  • Quincy Medical Closes after Cuts to Medicare, Patient Volume
  • Revenue Cycle Management, EHR Vendor Loyalty Gaining Momentum
  • Hospital Readmissions With Value-Based Penalties Vary by Provider
  • How Too Much Choice is Increasing Nursing Home Costs
  • DoJ Offers Insight into Anti-Steering, Antitrust Case with Atrium
  • Physician Assistant Compensation Increased Almost 3% in 2018
  • Attention to Point of Service Ups Provider Revenue
  • Revenue Integrity Top Hospital, Health System Exec Priority
  • Hospital Revenue Cycle Impacted by Patient Volume
  • How to Mitigate the Revenue Cycle Impact of the ICD-10 Delay
  • Fictitious Marketplace Enrollees Get Standardized Coverage
  • Provider Enrollment Restrictions Target Medicare Fraud in 6 States
  • Flexibility, Value-Based Payment Key to Rural Hospital Success
  • 3 Strategies to Reduce Hospital Readmission Rates, Costs
  • 55 Hospitals File Two-Midnight Rule Lawsuit Against HHS
  • Top 5 Ingredients of a Successful Alternative Payment Model
  • High-Value Culture, Population Health Programs Key to ACO Success
  • Are Specialists Happy with Value-Based Reimbursement?
  • Paperless Medical Billing Key to Boosting Patient Collections
  • Healthcare Revenue Cycle to Experience Significant Innovation
  • Court Rejects AHA’s Attempt to Block 340B Hospital Payment Cuts
  • Do Oncology Bundled Payments Promote Low-Value Drug Use?
  • Will Cost Shifting Drive Support for Larger Public Payments?
  • Provider Data Integrity Key to Directory Accuracy, Value-Based Care
  • Tenet Starts Chicago Market Exit with Sale of MacNeal Hospital
  • Rural Hospitals Join Forces to Access ACO Incentives
  • CMS’s Transparency Gaps Yield Invalid Medicare Payment Rates
  • Supreme Court Upholds Subsidies in King v. Burwell Decision
  • OIG: Medicare Contractor Erred in Two Reimbursement Claims
  • ICD-1 to ICD-11 Timeline Highlights Healthcare’s Evolution
  • How Revenue Cycle Management Became an Important Career
  • Is Sustainability the Future of Healthcare Spending Growth?
  • AHA Calls for Hospital Access to Prescription Drug Rate Info
  • Consumers Use Healthcare Price Info for Budgeting, Not Shopping
  • How St. Luke’s CFO Succeeds at Revenue Cycle Management
  • Predictive Analytics Top Healthcare Supply Chain Priorities
  • URAC Calls for Virtual Group Rules in Quality Payment Program
  • Big Healthcare Payers Thank Accountable Care for High Revenues
  • Hospitals Turn to Bolt-On, Outsourced Revenue Cycle Management
  • Are Medicare Health Plans Improving or Getting Weaker?
  • Twelve Things to Know Now About Value-Based Reimbursement
  • How Pioneer ACOs Earn Shared Savings, Improve Care Quality
  • Examining the Fee-for-Service v. Value-Based Payment Models
  • CMS Reveals Medicare-Medicaid Accountable Care Organization
  • CMS Releases DMEPOS Medicare Reimbursement Rates, Contracts
  • Recapping Finalized 2015 Rules from CMS on Medicare Payments
  • CMS Conducts Hospital Quality Star Rating System Run-Through
  • Mandatory Bundled Payments Drive Value-Based Care, Docs Argue
  • 100 Day ICD-10 Countdown: CMS’s Top 5 Steps for Readiness
  • Healthcare M&A Leads to 90% of Markets Being Highly Consolidated
  • AMGA: New MACRA Flexibilities May Penalize Prepared Providers
  • May 15: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Healthcare Costs, Outcomes Vary When VA Outsources Cardiac Care
  • 4 Fresh Accountable Care Organization Growth Predictions
  • CMS Touts Progress of State-Led Alternative Payment Model
  • HHS Invests $283M to Spread Primary Care Services
  • CMS’s Fraud Prevention System Thwarts $820M in Payment Abuse
  • Physician Compensation for Specialists 45.6% More than for PCPs
  • MSSP ACOs Improve Care Quality, Struggle to Realize Savings
  • What Considerations Do Alternative Payment Models Require?
  • Financial analytics present RCM opportunities for hospitals
  • Many Denials, Rejections to Follow the ICD-10 Transition?
  • AMGA Urges CMS to Release Claims Reimbursement Plan for CPC+
  • Pediatric Healthcare Costs 35% Less at Community Health Centers
  • How to Plan Out the Transition to Value-Based Reimbursements
  • House Reps Ask CMS for MACRA Implementation Flexibilities
  • Is MACRA a True Doc Fix for Value-Based Reimbursement?
  • Healthcare Sustainability Faces Challenges Worldwide
  • HHS Offers Special Medicare Reimbursement After Hurricane Irma
  • WEDI ICD-10 Readiness Survey Recommends HHS Compliancy
  • Does Medicaid Expansion Improve Revenue of Hospitals?
  • Healthcare Revenue Higher for Practices Employing More NPs, PAs
  • 61% of Next Generation ACOs Earned Shared Savings in 2016
  • 340B Hospitals Provided Similar Charity, More Uncompensated Care
  • Healthcare Payer, Provider Paradigm is Starting to Shift
  • Findings of the previous survey also indicated that the cost of implementation was “on target with expectations” or was “more than anticipated,” WEDI said. Although most providers said that costs were in line with expectations or higher, many claimed that costs were actually less than they had originally anticipated. However, most of the survey participants indicated that they did not expect to realize any return on investment with ICD-10.

    For vendors and health plans, the impact that the code had to productivity was mainly neutral. For providers, on the other hand, ICD-10’s implementation lead to a slight decrease in productivity levels.

    The post-implementation survey also included a section on lessons learned. According to many responses, there was value in starting ICD-10 early. Participants also found that communicating with trading partners and conducting extensive testing was useful. All participants indicated that CMS and WEDI resources were “very helpful.” They also found coding materials from industry organizations to be useful.

    The post-implementation survey also had a low response rate compared to previous similar surveys. This may imply that there was a lack of interest in ICD-10 activities that were not used in operations as well as reassignment of ICD-10 project personnel, WEDI theorized.

    ICD-10 was officially implemented in October 2015. Many healthcare professionals were originally concerned about its implementation. WEDI’s recent survey revealed that the overall transition was much less dramatic and cumbersome than many vendors, providers and health plans had anticipated previously.

    Dig Deeper:


    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...