Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Policy & Regulation News

ICD-10 Implementation Ran Smoother than Originally Expected

ICD-10 implementation costs were in line with expectations, testing improved, and productivity was not hurt, WEDI found in its latest survey.

By Catherine Sampson

- On May 9, the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI), announced that the ICD-10 implementation process was moderately smooth because costs were mostly in line with expectations and testing improved. Additionally, productivity levels did not appear to be impacted significantly, a press release revealed.  

Providers found ICD-10 implementation to be smooth because productivity levels were not hurt.

“WEDI has played a tremendous role in educating the industry and helping to best ease the impacts of the ICD-10 transition for many years,” said Jean Narcisi, chair of WEDI. “We wanted this post-implementation survey to be a closing chapter of assessment on why the transition went so well overall and to also leverage specific lessons learned for future large implementations.”

WEDI drew its conclusions from a post-ICD-10 implementation survey conducted in March 2016, which was five months after the code set was implemented. The organization interviewed providers, vendors and health plans.

The survey specifically examined the impacts of delays in ICD-10 implementation. Although changes to the compliance date increased costs for many providers, vendors and health plans, all sectors still said that the delays actually helped improve testing. As a result, the transition to ICD-10 was smoother than some organizations had previously anticipated.

  • August 14: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • CMS Must Inform Providers on New Medicare Reimbursement Policy
  • Hospital Care at Home Cuts Healthcare Costs in Half at MA Hospital
  • AMA Voices Concerns Over MACRA Implementation, MIPS, APMs
  • Hospitals, ASCs, 340B Drugs Face Medicare Reimbursement Changes
  • Colo. Agency Claims $4.1M Unallowable Medicaid Payments
  • Using Payer Enrollment to Jumpstart Revenue Cycle Optimization
  • CMS Announced Success of Primary Care Transformation Pilots
  • Bon Secours, Mercy Health Finalize Hospital Merger After 6 Months
  • House Requests CMS Delay Quality, Value-Based Care Ratings
  • Could Medicaid Fee Reimbursement Drop Significantly in 2015?
  • VA, DoD eBenefits User Growth Stimulates Veterans’ Access
  • Pharma Payments Influence Prescription Drug Spending
  • Lab Experts Help Providers Reduce Low-Value Resource Use, Costs
  • May 29: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Are Federal Value-Based Care Programs Truly Promoting Value?
  • Providers Investing in Home Health to Prepare for Aging Population
  • Key Strategies for Health Systems to Achieve Economies of Scale
  • MGMA to CMS: Notify Clinicians About MIPS Eligibility ASAP
  • Industry Experts Express Concern Over CMS Open Payments Data
  • Healthcare Consumerism Challenges Primary Care Business Models
  • 2 Key ICD-10 Points-Counterpoints to Consider Within 21 Days
  • CMS Issues Final Rule on Home Health Medicare Reimbursement
  • HHS Offers Special Medicare Reimbursement After Hurricane Irma
  • Rural Hospitals Faced Less Value-Based Reimbursement Penalties
  • CMS Finalizes MACRA Implementation, Quality Payment Program
  • Healthcare Innovation Requires Common Ground
  • HITECH Report: Healthcare Reform Continues with EHR Adoption
  • Hospitals, Health Systems Eye Financial Snags in ACA Repeal
  • ICD-10 News the Landslide Leader in 2015’s Top 10 Stories
  • Medicare Readmission Penalties Hit 2,610 Hospitals
  • Login, Submit Data Early for MIPS Reporting Success, CMS Advises
  • Top Six Proposed Physician Fee Schedules, Payment Policies
  • 36% of ACOs Consider Quitting MSSP Under New Proposed Rules
  • NY Senator Challenges Rural Medicare Reimbursement Repayment
  • CMS Rule Addresses Medicare Fraud, Overpayment Compliance
  • 2012 MSSP ACOs Decreased Post-Acute Care Spending by 9%
  • Does Improved Care Access, Insurance Coverage Stem from ACA?
  • Tennessee Shoots Down Medicaid Expansion
  • HHS, CMS Speak Out on CMS’s Innovation Center Pilot Project
  • June 12: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • March 13: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • How Advanced Care Discussions Impact Provider Payment Focus
  • Examining Differences Between Medicare, Medicaid Reimbursement
  • How MACRA, MIPS Will Impact Critical Access Hospitals, FQHCs
  • How a Small Hospital Increased Patient Collections by 300%
  • CMS: Providers Need Data Access for Value-Based Reimbursement
  • How to Mitigate the Revenue Cycle Impact of the ICD-10 Delay
  • More Site-Neutral Payments to Impact Value-Based Care, Reps Says
  • Mass. Receives $41.4B for Federal Healthcare Waiver
  • The Affordable Care Act’s Effect on Hospital Charity Care
  • CMS Aims to Protect Medicaid Payments to Providers, Not 3rd Parties
  • Healthcare Employment Shifting to Hospital-Employed Providers
  • Accountable Care Organization Saves $4.8M With Nutrition Aid
  • How Hospitals Bring in Revenue Through the Healthcare Supply Chain
  • OIG Identifies Top HHS Financial, Medicare Fraud Challenges
  • Colorado Launches Multi-Payer Data-Sharing Online Tool
  • Penalties Handed Out to 257K Meaningful Use EPs
  • Patient Leakage Costs Most Healthcare Facilities 10% of Revenue
  • CMS Releases Medicare Reimbursement Schedule for DMEPOS Items
  • Revenue Cycle Management, EHR Vendor Loyalty Gaining Momentum
  • CMS Reopens 2018 Next Generation ACO Model Applications
  • How to Address Bundled Payment Cost Reduction Challenges
  • OIG Releases Healthcare Fraud Compliance Program Guidelines
  • July 2: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • 2015 skilled nursing facility PPS, consolidated billing
  • Is Radiation Overuse Contributing to Higher Healthcare Costs?
  • ER Spending Rose 99% Since 2009 Despite No Change in Utilization
  • Healthcare M&A Leads to 90% of Markets Being Highly Consolidated
  • Using Text Messages to Improve Healthcare Recruitment, Employment
  • EHR Documentation Policies Improve Revenue Cycle Management
  • Hospitals Saw 23% Rise in Inpatient Prescription Drug Spending
  • How Automating Payer Enrollment Reduces Time to Reimbursement
  • Provider Data Standardization Critical to Improving Inaccuracies
  • Home Health Owners Face Charges for Medicare Fraud, Upcoding
  • Over 1,300 Hospitals Urge CMS to Withdraw 340B Drug Payment Cuts
  • AHA: Stark Law Exception Advances Alternative Payment Models
  • Is It Too Soon to Gauge ICD-10’s Long-Term Coding Future?
  • CMS Puts Medicare Part B Claims on Two Week Hold
  • 63% Capitation Needed to Sustain Primary Care Transformation
  • CMS Ups Medicare Reimbursement for Inpatient Admissions $2.4B
  • Leading Accountable Care Organization Group Opposes MSSP Overhaul
  • House Reps Want to Extend MSSP Track 1 ACO Participation
  • FTC: Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions May Create Monopolies
  • Atrium Health Settles Anticompetitive Hospital Contracting Claims
  • How Does Value-Based Reimbursement Affect Pediatric ACOs?
  • Ala. organization overdrew $15M in federal Medicaid funds
  • Doctors, Employers Disagree on Healthcare Payment Reform Strategy
  • CMS Explores ICD-10 Scenarios with Interactive Case Studies
  • How Does Meaningful Use Impact Revenue Cycle Management?
  • ACA Support Rising to 55% as Physicians Value Quality Care
  • Health Systems, Physicians See Significant Revenue Losses in 2015
  • NYC Hospital Adds Epic Revenue Cycle Management to EHR System
  • Specialists Lack Medicare Alternative Payment Model, MACRA Options
  • Examining the Fee-for-Service v. Value-Based Payment Models
  • Prehabilitation Lowers Episode Costs Under Bundled Payment Models
  • CMS Announces Year Two of Open Payments Database
  • Hospitalization-Based Bundled Payment Models Key to Lowering Costs
  • WEDI Guide Suggests New Electronic Fund Transfer, ERA Standards
  • Revenue Integrity Top Hospital, Health System Exec Priority
  • Findings of the previous survey also indicated that the cost of implementation was “on target with expectations” or was “more than anticipated,” WEDI said. Although most providers said that costs were in line with expectations or higher, many claimed that costs were actually less than they had originally anticipated. However, most of the survey participants indicated that they did not expect to realize any return on investment with ICD-10.

    For vendors and health plans, the impact that the code had to productivity was mainly neutral. For providers, on the other hand, ICD-10’s implementation lead to a slight decrease in productivity levels.

    The post-implementation survey also included a section on lessons learned. According to many responses, there was value in starting ICD-10 early. Participants also found that communicating with trading partners and conducting extensive testing was useful. All participants indicated that CMS and WEDI resources were “very helpful.” They also found coding materials from industry organizations to be useful.

    The post-implementation survey also had a low response rate compared to previous similar surveys. This may imply that there was a lack of interest in ICD-10 activities that were not used in operations as well as reassignment of ICD-10 project personnel, WEDI theorized.

    ICD-10 was officially implemented in October 2015. Many healthcare professionals were originally concerned about its implementation. WEDI’s recent survey revealed that the overall transition was much less dramatic and cumbersome than many vendors, providers and health plans had anticipated previously.

    Dig Deeper:

    X

    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy


    no, thanks

    Continue to site...