Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid


New Pilot Program Bundles Cancer Care Payment

By Ryan Mcaskill

MD Anderson and UnitedHealthcare have launched a new pilot program for bundled cancer care payments.

- There is no question that paying ongoing care can be a challenge for some patients, even with insurance. Patients dealing with cancer, for example, have expensive tests, long-term treatments, follow-up care and supportive services that need to be paid for.

This type of challenge has some healthcare payers and providers looking for new ways to handle payments. It was announced last month that the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and UnitedHealthcare have partnered to launch as pilot program that explores a new cancer care payment model for head and neck cancers that focuses on quality patient care and outcomes. This is the first time that a bundled payment method that reimburses a care provider for a defined episode of care under a single fee or payment had been tried at a large, comprehensive cancer center.

In an interview with, Thomas Feeley, M.D., head of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, and head of the institute, spoke about how the pilot program came to be and why it is important.

According to Feeley, MD Anderson Cancer Center’s Institute for Cancer Care Innovation and UnitedHealthcare discussed the possibility of doing a pilot for a new payment model for some time. Both groups share a common goal of providing quality care while managing costs and the pilot was officially launched in November 2014 at MD Anderson.

  • Aurora Health Care Pays $12M to Settle Healthcare Fraud Claims
  • MSSP ACOs Decreased Spending by $1B, Improved Care Quality
  • 721 Hospitals Penalized for Hospital-Acquired Condition Rate
  • Exploring Key Components of the Healthcare Revenue Cycle
  • MGMA to CMS: Notify Clinicians About MIPS Eligibility ASAP
  • HITECH Report: Healthcare Reform Continues with EHR Adoption
  • How to Address Bundled Payment Cost Reduction Challenges
  • Cost Management Effectively Optimizes Revenue Cycle Activity
  • Half of PCPs Aware of Medicare Reimbursement for Chronic Care Mgmt
  • NH Postpones Medicaid Managed Care Implementation
  • Hospitals Weigh in on Medicare DSH Payment Supreme Court Case
  • Industry Orgs Urge CMS to Lower Risk for MACRA’s Advanced APMs
  • Target Prices to Control Prescription Drug Spending, AHA Advises
  • Pharma Payments Influence Prescription Drug Spending
  • Dissecting Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Reporting
  • Congress Urged to Repeal Affordable Care Act’s Cadillac Tax
  • Premier Medicare ACOs Outperform Peers in Cost, Quality By 2:1
  • Hospitals Want Practice Management Systems to Work with EHR, RCM
  • CMS Says Information Technology Builds Healthcare Delivery
  • Credit Card On File Program Key To Patient Collections Success
  • Inpatient Volume, Revenue Drops as Outpatient Care Makes Gains
  • 52-47 Senate Vote Confirms Tom Price as New HHS Secretary
  • House Reps Create Caucus for Value-Based Reimbursement, Health IT
  • Provider Collaboratives Combat Healthcare Merger Pressures
  • AMA Inaugurates Stack, Youngest President in 160 Year History
  • Flexibility Key to Revenue Cycle Management Vendor Selection
  • More Hospitals Start Upfront Medical Billing Practices
  • Rate review programs reduce healthcare premiums by $993M
  • CMS Requests Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Discussion
  • Industry Orgs Urge Lawmakers to Continue Value-Based Care Push
  • Black, ACR Praise CMS’s ICD-10 12-Month Safe Harbor Period
  • Praise for Patient-Centered Payment Models, Bundled Payments
  • Medicare Compliance Audit Finds Orlando Health Overbilled $1.45M
  • CMS Announced Success of Primary Care Transformation Pilots
  • Looking Beyond Price in the Healthcare Supply Chain to Add Value
  • Hospitals Still Facing Medicare Claims Denial Management Issues
  • 32 Orgs to Cut Healthcare Costs, Use Under CMS Community Demo
  • Academic Medical Centers Receive More Value-Based Penalties
  • AHA Critiques Medicare Reimbursement Changes for Home Health
  • 3 Strategies to Minimize the Burden of Prior Authorizations
  • New WEDI Focus on Bundled Payments, Value-Based Initiatives
  • Innovative Care Models Lower Costs, Improve Health
  • Why long-term incentive use more than doubled in two years
  • Do Accountable Care Organizations Save Claims Reimbursement?
  • 4 Revenue Cycle Management, Claims Reimbursement Strategies
  • Using Data Analytics to Decrease Claims Denials, Boost Revenue
  • MI Hospital System Pays $84.5M to Resolve Healthcare Fraud Claims
  • Expert Seeks Payment Reform in Light of Healthcare Mergers
  • AHA: Global Budget Payments Help to Treat Vulnerable Communities
  • Why the Value-Based Care Journey Begins with Assessment
  • Open Payments Database Debuts New Feature, Announces Updates
  • 1 Million First Attempt ICD-10 Claims Yield 99% Success Rate
  • New DMEPOS Prices Reduce Medicare Spending, Ensure Care Access
  • Hospitals Acquired 5K Independent Practices from 2015 to 2016
  • Physician Shortage Drives Boost in Nursing, Physician Assistant Pay
  • Major Health Systems Create New Company to Tackle Drug Shortages
  • AMGA: New MACRA Flexibilities May Penalize Prepared Providers
  • Type of Provider Data Presented Influences Patient Volume, Choice
  • CMS, AMA Announce ICD-10 Deal to Avoid Financial Disruption
  • CMS Proposes to Update Medicare Reimbursement Rates for OPPS
  • CMS Reveals Medicare-Medicaid Accountable Care Organization
  • Real Costs Up to 8% Higher for Some Cancers in Oncology Care Model
  • Congress Passes 2-Year Cadillac Tax Delay, Repeal Possible
  • Health Systems, Physicians See Significant Revenue Losses in 2015
  • CMS Saves $42B Through Healthcare Fraud Prevention Activities
  • Healthcare Prices, Spending, Employment Decline in Early 2017
  • Five Best Practices to Prepare for Value-Based Reimbursement
  • August 7: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Preparing Providers for Value-Based Care, Consumerism in Healthcare
  • CMS: We Must Do More Than New Healthcare Price Transparency Rule
  • Black Book Names Optum360 Top HIM, Coding Outsourcing Vendor
  • Affordability, Access and Quality Proof ACA Is Working
  • 2015: Year That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Co-Pays, Regulations a Challenge for Specialty Practices
  • Medicare DSH Payment Case Makes Its Way to the Supreme Court
  • ICD-10 Compliance: From Provider Uncertainty to Certainty
  • More Primary Care Leads to Less End-of-Life Medicare Spending
  • Expanded Resolution Process Opens to Lower Medicare Appeals Backlog
  • Why Site Neutral Payment Reimbursements Are Incomparable
  • AMA: Health Payers Lagging with Prior Authorization Reform
  • Could More Competition Reduce Rising Prescription Drug Costs?
  • Medicaid Acceptance, Payment Rates Both on the Decline
  • AMGA Advises CMS on Including MA Models as Advanced APMs by 2018
  • Is Primary Care’s Role Keeping Up with Health Demographics?
  • May 15: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Audit: Children’s Hospital Had Overpayments Owed to Medicaid
  • Shift Admin, QGenda Top Physician Scheduling Vendors, KLAS Reports
  • HHS Bringing Value-Based Purchasing to SNFs, Post-Acute Care
  • More young adults have healthcare post-ACA implementation
  • The Difficulty in Quantifying Improper Medicaid Payments
  • Data Analytics Top Healthcare Supply Chain Priority in 2018
  • HHS Mulls Private Sector Dialogue to Foster Healthcare Innovation
  • Paperless Medical Billing Key to Boosting Patient Collections
  • Quality Payment Program Top Regulatory Burden for Practices
  • Providers Pay Millions to Resolve Medicare Fraud Cases
  • AHA Supports Antitrust Laws, Urges Congress Pass SMARTER Act
  • Reduced Variation, Data Analytics Cut Supply Chain Costs by 17.8%
  • Healthcare Consumers Lack Transparency, Price Info Awareness
  • How Providers Can Avoid 2016 Medicare Payment Adjustments
  • NAM Advises Leaders to Prioritize Value-Based Purchasing Reform
  • This is something that MD Anderson and its care center have been examining for the last five years. The new pilot will last three years and deal only with about 150 patients newly diagnosed with cancers of the salivary glands, oral cavity, throat and larynx, and who are enrolled in certain employer-sponsored benefit plans insured or administered by UnitedHealthcare.

    “This pilot reflects the first major look at a change in reimbursement for cancer care in many years,” Feeley said. He added that differs from the current fee-for-service model because: “under the pilot program, MD Anderson will not  be paid for every visit and procedure but for all the care over a fixed period of time.”

    According to Feeley, cancer offers unique challenges for patients because of the sheer number of obstacles that need to be overcome. Not only are their doctor’s visits to pay for, but every procedure, test and treatment – including chemotherapy, surgery or radiation therapy or a combination of the three – that follows. This process can happen over a span of many month. On top of that, there are follow-up visits with any number of providers and specialists. Now, instead of multiple “confusing statements,” patients in the program will receive one comprehensive bill.

    “[MD Anderson] have been looking at how to best approach a single price for treating cancers.  It is a complex question because cancer is a complex disease and each patient unique,” said Feeley. “Bundled pricing is something that patients and care providers want, and this is our first opportunity to better understand how we can manage costs without sacrificing quality care and patient outcomes.”

    Feeley added that while this pilot is starting with cancer centers, if successful it could be applied other practice settings. Ultimately, it is believed that this is a better way to pay for value.

    “Our partnership with MD Anderson Cancer Center marks an important step toward expanded bundled care payment models and away from the traditional fee-for-service payments for oncology care,” Lee Newcomer, M.D., United Healthcare’s vice president, oncology, said in the press release about the . “Our recently completed pilot shows that these creative new cancer care payment models can reduce healthcare costs while improving patient outcomes. MD Anderson’s work with value-based workflows makes them a natural partner for bundled payments.”

    Patients who are a part of the pilot program will get the exact same care if they were not a part of the program paying for fee-for-service. Feeley said that clinicians will not know who is or isn’t in the bundle pilot. Instead, both groups will be examined to determine the economic impact of the pilot.

    Ultimately, this is new territory for both sides as the pilot will test the feasibility of bundling. With an increased focus on value-based care, pilot programs like this will become more common.


    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...