Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Policy & Regulation News

New York Faces $1M in Inappropriate Medicaid Claims

By Stephanie Reardon

Nearly $1 million paid in Medicaid claims for beneficiaries who already had these services paid for through managed care plans.

- The New York State Office of the State Comptroller has released an audit on the Medicaid program department of Health. The audit was focused on the fee-for-service claim payments for pharmacy services. The findings details the inappropriate payment of nearly $1 million for Medicaid beneficiaries who already had these services paid for through managed care plans.

The Department of Medicaid Services in New York has two payment methods to reimburse Medicaid providers: fee-for-service or managed care plans. The fee-for-service method pays the provider for every Medicaid service given to the beneficiary. The managed care plan on the other hand, is a monthly payment made to providers for each enrolled beneficiary.

Originally, pharmacy benefits were reimbursed through the fee for service method because they had been excluded from managed care coverage. However, by October 1, 2011, managed care plans covered most pharmacy benefits eliminating the need for fee-for-service reimbursement. This created confusion.

According to auditor Thomas DiNapoli, the inappropriate Medicaid payments happened because managed care enrollment information was not updated. From October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013, Medicaid paid $978,251 fee-for-service pharmacy claims for beneficiaries who were already covered by managed care.

  • Is it Time to Revamp the CMS Star Rating System?
  • CMS Proposes to Limit Supplemental Medicaid Reimbursement
  • How Does Meaningful Use Impact Revenue Cycle Management?
  • Over 50% of Orgs Lack Adequate Healthcare Cost Reduction Goals
  • Sutter Health Destroys Evidence for Case on High Healthcare Prices
  • Physician Alignment Drives Healthcare Revenue Cycle Progress
  • Calif. Managed Care Organization Tax Proposal Axed
  • Appeals Court Supports FTC Request to Stop PA Hospital Merger
  • April 10: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • CMS Appeals Ruling on Changing Medicaid DSH Payment Rules in MO
  • Are Part B Rx drug rates higher than other gov’t programs?
  • MSSP ACOs Saved $1.84B, Nearly Double CMS Estimate, Study Finds
  • Examining the Value-Based Alternative Payment Model Basics
  • Examining the Revenue Cycle Post-Affordable Care Act
  • CMS Issues 2018 MACRA Implementation, Quality Payment Program Rule
  • Cost Inflation of Hospital Mergers, Physician Acquisitions
  • DoJ Memo Limiting Guidance Use to Impact Healthcare Fraud Cases
  • Transradial, Same Day Discharge Cardiac Care Drops Costs by $3.7K
  • AMGA: Drop Transition, Add MSSP Track for MACRA Implementation
  • Women’s Health Leader Shuns Senate’s Blocked ACA Repeal Vote
  • 61% of CFOs Expect the Axe for Poor Revenue Cycle Management
  • Employers Play Bigger Role in Value-Based Reimbursement Transition
  • $2.75B in Unexpected Healthcare Spending Impacts VA Budget
  • GA Provider Receives Jail Time for a Healthcare Fraud Scheme
  • Costly Aspects of an Overstretched Revenue Cycle Management
  • Healthcare Leaders Express Confidence for 2015
  • AHA Reacts to Proposed Anti-Kickback Statute Revisions
  • AMA, CMS Lead Discussion on Evolving Healthcare Market Today
  • Hospitals Seek Independent Docs for Referrals, Healthcare Revenue
  • Medicare Spends $3.1B More on Hospital-Employed Physicians
  • Cerner: ICD-10 Collaboration Efforts, Support Systems Vital
  • Youth mental health services to receive $99M in HHS funding
  • CMS Defines Physician Quality Reporting Improvement Efforts
  • AMGA: Slow Encounter Data Transition in Medicare Reimbursement
  • UnitedHealth Takes Steps to Embrace Value-Based Reimbursement
  • Is U.S. Healthcare Really a Big Spender in Global Contrast?
  • CMS Extends Upcoming Two-Midnight Partial Enforcement Delay
  • OIG Identifies Top HHS Financial, Medicare Fraud Challenges
  • Providers Prefer Manual Nurse Scheduling Over Predictive Analytics
  • CMS Proposes Revisions to Medicaid Improper Payment Programs
  • Court Rejects AHA’s Attempt to Block 340B Hospital Payment Cuts
  • 41% of Providers, Payers Adopt Value-Based Care Reimbursement
  • Patient Financial Responsibility Increased 11% in 2017
  • 382 Hospitals Earn Initial Reconciliation Payments Under CJR Model
  • Managing the Revenue Cycle while Acquiring Physician Practices
  • Revenue Cycle Management, Upgrades Jump to Top Hospital Priority
  • 60% of Federal Revenue to Come from Risk-Based Models by 2019
  • 77% of Leaders Say Their Provider Orgs Use Paper Patient Billing
  • Value-Based Care Penalties Spark Greater Quality Improvements
  • Healthcare Pricing Trends Suggest Marketplace Complexity
  • Healthcare Orgs Still Rely on Paper-Based Medical Billing
  • Former Tenet Exec Charged in $400M Healthcare Fraud Scheme
  • LA Hospital Pays $42M to Settle Healthcare Fraud, Kickback Case
  • Consumers Favor Patient Financial Responsibility Loan Programs
  • Bon Secours, Mercy Health Engaging in Hospital Merger Talks
  • 52% of Provider Compensation Bonuses Tied to RVUs, Not Quality
  • AHA, FAH: ACA Repeal Could Cost Hospital Revenue Cycle Billions
  • Risk-Averse MSSP ACOs Missed $966M By Not Assuming Downside Risk
  • HHS Announces 2015 Medicare Premiums and Deductibles
  • CMS Answers 5 ICD-10 Coding, Reimbursement, Test Questions
  • Sept. 11: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • CMS Issues Final Changes for Medicare Reimbursement Programs
  • Are Hospitals Committed to Population Health Collaborations?
  • Addressing Healthcare Consumerism a Top Priority for Docs in 2019
  • AMA President Urges Physicians Prepare for ICD-10 Transition
  • The Multiple Benefits of Remote Monitoring and Telehealth
  • Is Consumer-Centric Revenue Cycle Management the Solution?
  • How to Improve Healthcare Mergers and Acquisitions Strategies
  • Baylor Scott & White, Memorial Hermann Eye Hospital Merger Deal
  • Healthcare Reform Bill to Financially Support Mental Illness
  • Providers Pay Millions to Resolve Medicare Fraud Cases
  • CMS Prepares Providers for End of ICD-10 Coding Flexibilities
  • Voluntary Bundled Payments Launch, HHS Nominee Backs Mandatory APMs
  • CMS’s Transparency Gaps Yield Invalid Medicare Payment Rates
  • How a Small Hospital Increased Patient Collections by 300%
  • Hospital Wage Data Inaccuracies Led to Medicare Reimbursement Issues
  • UNC Health Care, Atrium Health Scrap Hospital Merger Deal
  • Oncologist Org Fights Medicare Reimbursement Cut to Cancer Drugs
  • CMS Awards Equipment Contracts to Reduce Medicare Spending
  • Cost Data to Improve Quality Reporting, Value-Based Purchasing
  • Healthcare Execs Ponder Financial Impact of Possible ACA Repeal
  • 2015 proposed physician fee schedule, Part B revisions
  • Low Reimbursement, High Costs Threaten Physician RCM Success
  • Is Fee-for-Value Payment Reform Transition Merely a Trend?
  • NAM Advises Leaders to Prioritize Value-Based Purchasing Reform
  • Hospital Revenue Cycle Management Marketplace to Reach $9.9B by 2016
  • Healthcare Merger and Acquisition Deal Value Dips in Q3 2018
  • AHA: Stark Law Exception Advances Alternative Payment Models
  • Cancer Costs Don’t Rise Faster than Other Healthcare Spending
  • OIG Releases 2014 Top Management and Performance Challenges
  • Private Sector to Drive Bundled Payments After CMS Cancellations
  • November 13: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • What is the Medicare Shared Savings Program Track 1+ Model?
  • Does 2015 ICD-10 Transition Mean Millions in Unpaid Claims?
  • How a medical billing dispute led to blocked patient data
  • Key Ways to Succeed Under MACRA’s Quality Payment Program
  • CMS Adds Confusion to CME Open Payment Requirements
  • OIG Releases 2015 Work Plan for CMS Investigative Initiatives
  • AMGA Voices Concerns Over Cardiac Care Bundled Payments Model
  • Specialists Fear IPI Drug Pricing Model Could Harm Patient Access
  • “According to Department guidelines, if the mother of a newborn is enrolled in a managed care plan, the newborn child should also be enrolled in the plan, and the managed care plan assumes medical risk for the newborn on the actual date of birth,” the report explains.

    During the audit, it was discovered that the hospital didn’t update information in a time-appropriate way for births as required. Out of the 14,369 late enrollment recipient updates, 13,463 (94 percent) were newborns whose mothers were enrolled in a managed care plan.

    How can providers avoid this?

    State Medicaid programs should work to ensure that all fee-for-service enrollment information is updated in a time-appropriate manner to prevent this type of problem. State Medicaid providers should also continue to work to meet compliance methods.

    Specific to this case, DiNapoli recommends that the State’s Medicaid agency investigate and recover approximately $978,251 in inappropriately distributed payments and report live births within five business days.

    The Department of health agreed with the findings listed in the audit. The Department has researched these overpayments and implemented edits to their process to prevent this problem going forward.

    Medicaid compliance is vital to limiting errors and, as a result, limiting the possible penalties imposed for noncompliance. A recent report on RevCycleIntelligence.com, detailed another audit that took place for New York Medicaid Services. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) discovered that the State Agency claimed $76,817,444 for improper Medicaid reimbursement. The OIG recommended that the State agency refund $79,328 to the Federal Government.

     

    X

    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy


    no, thanks

    Continue to site...