Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Reimbursement News

Open Payments Data Filled With Spelling, Other Errors

By Ryan Mcaskill

A  number of spelling and reporting errors were found throughout the open payments data website.

- In September 2014, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released the first round of Open Payments data. As part of the Sunshine Act, physicians and teaching hospitals were required to release information on payments received from drug and device manufacturers.

In the initial offerings included numbers from 546,000 individual physicians and almost 1,360 teaching hospitals. It was a total of 4.4 million payments that are valued at $3.5 billion. In December, the information was refreshed and 68,000 records were added.

The goal of the program is to add a layer of transparency to the healthcare system. By knowing who is paying physicians and teaching hospitals, patients will have a better idea of whether their judgement or treatment recommendations might be biased. However, the system has had a rocky road so far.

When it launched, 39 percent of payments were de-identified, because the vetting process had not been completed. On top of that, many believed the collection time frame (five months) was not long enough to make an accurate assessment of the data or for both sides to insure that the numbers submitted were accurate.

  • Healthcare Transparency Bill Proposes to Delay Star Ratings
  • CMS Confirms More Affordable 2016 Medicare Part B Premiums
  • Methodist Healthcare Received $5.8M in Medicare Overpayments
  • CMS Announces HPID Final Rule Public Commentary Period
  • KLAS: Business Intelligence Use Varies, Epic Systems Leads Adoption
  • Why Revenue Cycle Must Evolve with Healthcare
  • The Week That Was in Medical Billing Fraud
  • CMS Proposes Revisions to Medicaid Improper Payment Programs
  • Creating Alternative Payment Models to Support Health Centers
  • Physician Practices Struggling with New Payment Models
  • How Illinois Medicaid Reduced Costs, Improved Care
  • AHA: Limiting Low-Value Medical Resource Use Cuts Healthcare Costs
  • Is Fee-for-Value Payment Reform Transition Merely a Trend?
  • What is the New Future of Value-Based Payment Programs?
  • NJ Quality Improvement Model Lowers Healthcare Costs by $641M
  • Medical Billing Codes Do Not Address Full Scope of Primary Care
  • Praise for Patient-Centered Payment Models, Bundled Payments
  • Seeing PCP As Main Provider Lowered Medicare Spending by 9%
  • Core Competencies for Accountable Care Organization Development
  • 28% of Adults Say Docs Discuss Patient Financial Responsibility
  • Top Healthcare Jobs Have High Growth Outlook Through 2022
  • CMS May Save $343 Million through Surgical Bundled Payments
  • ACOs and Other Value-Based Purchasing Models Have Yet to Cut Costs
  • NY Senator Challenges Rural Medicare Reimbursement Repayment
  • WEDI: ICD-10 Coding Guideline Negates Some Claim Audit Policies
  • Top 4 Strategies to Achieve Affordable Value-Based Care
  • Limited Quality Benefits for Early Pay-For-Performance Adopters
  • AMA: Eliminate Prior Authorization for Opioid Abuse Treatment
  • Rural Hospitals Faced Less Value-Based Reimbursement Penalties
  • How Easily Can Seniors Access Medicare Preferred Pharmacies?
  • 92% of Docs Say Prior Authorizations Negatively Impact Outcomes
  • Could Medicaid Fee Reimbursement Drop Significantly in 2015?
  • NY Claimed $23M Unallowable Medicaid Reimbursement Funds
  • Voluntary Bundled Payments Launch, HHS Nominee Backs Mandatory APMs
  • Medicare Spending Increases Slightly under Affordable Care Act
  • CMS Reports SNF Payment Incentives May Cut Medicare Spending
  • 25% of Physicians Dissatisfied with Provider Compensation Rates
  • Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions Causes Cancer Costs to Rise
  • Orgs Troubled by Post-Acute Care’s Role in New Bundled Payments
  • NQF Eyes Adding Social Risk Factors to Value-Based Purchasing
  • Majority of High-Earning Physicians Use Fee-for-Service
  • Why Claims Accuracy Testing, QA Isn’t Working for Healthcare
  • Did Risk-Based APMs Propel Greater Provider Consolidation?
  • Hospital Execs Look to Operations to Control Healthcare Costs
  • MSSP ACOs Fell $2B Short of CBO’s Medicare Spending Estimate
  • Hospitals Saw 23% Rise in Inpatient Prescription Drug Spending
  • Affordable Care Act Saved Medicare Beneficiaries $20 Billion
  • How to Achieve Value Within the Value-Based Care Transition
  • 6 Steps for Safeguarding the Healthcare Revenue Stream
  • BMC Pays $1.1M to Resolve Medical Billing Fraud Allegations
  • $100B Aftermath of Medicare Access, CHIP Reauthorization Act
  • VA Gives RNs Full Practice Authority to Improve Care Access
  • Do Financial Benchmarks Truly Measure ACO Savings, Spending?
  • Emerging Managed Care Pharmacy Trends Impact Patients, Payers
  • Will Inefficient Financial Healthcare Reform Kill the ACA?
  • Healthcare Dollars Moving to Alternative Payment Models, LAN Finds
  • OR Cost Scorecards Help Reduce Healthcare Supply Chain Costs
  • Bundled Payments Model Cuts Joint Replacement Costs by $1,166
  • 3 More ICD-10 Implementation Tips from Healthcare Experts
  • 340B Hospitals Provided Similar Charity, More Uncompensated Care
  • Shift Admin, QGenda Top Physician Scheduling Vendors, KLAS Reports
  • Reimbursement, Regulation the Biggest Challenges to Telehealth
  • CMS Proposes 2018 Quality Payment Program Changes
  • CAGW criticizes CMS, Marilyn Tavenner for ACA expenditures
  • Rural Hospitals Get Low-Volume, Medicare-Dependent Funds Extended
  • Provider Org Pays $3M for Violating Medicare Fraud Resolution
  • How MACRA, MIPS Will Impact Critical Access Hospitals, FQHCs
  • Healthcare Employment Shifting to Hospital-Employed Providers
  • Pres Trump Eyes 340B Drug Reforms to Lower Prescription Drug Costs
  • CMS Reports $2.4B in Healthcare Consumer ACA Premium Rebates
  • CMS Proposes New Quality Reporting for Skilled Nursing Facilities
  • St. Luke’s CEO: ‘Patient-Centered Billing’ Is Key
  • 3 ICD-10 Changes Include Specificity, Expansion, Combination
  • Senate Finance Committee, Conway, Address Medicare Spending
  • CMS Shares New Qualified Entity Program Growth Developments
  • April 10: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • CMS, CDC Add More than 5,000 Codes to ICD-10 Coding System
  • HHS Distributes $36.3M in Affordable Care Act Funding
  • Do Accountable Care Organizations Improve Patient Experience?
  • More MSSP ACOs Saved Money, Earned Shared Savings in 2017
  • Public Health Funding for Disease Prevention Drops by $40B
  • Over 600 Individuals Charged in 2018 Healthcare Fraud Takedown
  • CMS Delays Two-Midnight Rule, Medicare Claims Now Pending
  • How the 2016 Budget Will Change Medicare and Medicaid
  • ICD-10 Implementation: Five Facts to Know Now
  • Slavitt Names ICD-10 Ombudsman, Officials Tackle ICD-10 Q&A
  • HHS Backs Behavioral Health with $23M Grant Funding Efforts
  • Why medical practices spend more on business operations
  • Will Behavioral Economics Improve Alternative Payment Models?
  • CMS Adds Confusion to CME Open Payment Requirements
  • Revenue Uncertainty a Major Challenge for Clinicians
  • Judge Denies Hospital Org Attempt to Block 340B Drug Payment Cut
  • Hospital Overpaid $110,943 in Medicare Claims
  • Hospitals Could Save $25.4B in Healthcare Supply Chain Costs
  • Most Physicians Will Not Drop Payer Contract Despite Poor Pay
  • Telehealth Reimbursement Needed for its Growth, Advancement
  • Do NP, PA Ordering Habits Lead to Higher Healthcare Costs?
  • 2015 proposed physician fee schedule, Part B revisions
  • Orgs Not Living Up to Risk-Based Revenue Goals, C-Suite Says
  • HHS Launches Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network
  • Now, a new issue with the database has been raised, and it has to do with the accuracy of the information. An article co-published by the New York Times’ “The Upshot” and ProPublical, the data on the website is riddled with factual and spelling errors.

    The article features the results of an analysis of the website. It found drug companies that misspelled the name of their drugs and products multiple times. In one instance the depressing drug Fetzima was spelled “Fetziima” 953 times. In another case, medical device company Amedica Corp. called its Preference screw system “Preferance.”

    The problem was uncovered as the new sources was attempted to find the most prevalent drugs and products listed on the website. They noticed the information looked off and upon further investigation discovered the spelling mistakes.

    “We are very committed to not altering data,” Shantanu Agrawal, director of CMS’ Center for Program Integrity, told the news source. “Our role is not to spell-check for the industry. The act of transparency also will improve the data itself.”

    Agrawal did add, however, that as mistakes were brought to light, CMS would work to correct them.

    Other issues discovered include:

    •Payments associated with a single drug listed under multiple names.

    •About 8.5 percent of 4.3 million general payments were not for a specific product.

    •Companies listed products as “unrecognized.”

    •Products listed under the wrong category.

    •Payments made for multiple drugs and products were not broken up.

    •Payments for multiple drugs had the same drug listed multiple times.

    •Subsidiaries listed payments for one drug multiple times.

    John Murphy, assistant general counsel at the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said that mistakes like this are understandable, as it is the first year data like this has been collected.

    “It’s not surprising… that there are some errors out there,” Murphy said. “I’d suspect this stuff will get much more streamlined and much better.”


    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...