Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management, ICD-10, Claims Reimbursement, Medicare, Medicaid

Policy & Regulation News

ICD-10 Adoption Costs Lower than Previously Reported

By Ryan Mcaskill

New research found the cost of upgrading to ICD-10 for small practices is much lower than projected.

- The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is in its 10th revision. Better known as ICD-10, it is the medical classification list by the World Health Organization that contains codes for diseases, signs and symptoms, abnormal findings and more. It is used a standard diagnostic tool for health management and clinical purposes.

The United States has pushed its deadline for ICD-10 adoption several times, but many practices are looking into what it will take to upgrade their system to ensure they meet any and all requirements. For all practices, this means an investment of time, money and productivity as assessments are run, training takes place, software is converted and testing happens. This can be a monumental undertaking and can be too much for small practices to handle.

However, according to a new report from the Journal of Ahima, current evidence suggests that initial estimates of the cost and effort associated with ICD-10 implementation for small physician offices is much lower than previously reported.

“The new data suggest that the estimated costs, time and resources required by physician offices are dramatically lower than initially estimated as a result of readily available free and low cost solutions offered by coding, education and software vendors,” the article reads. “The revised estimated costs for ICD-10 for a small practice to be prepared for the conversion to ICD-10 is in the range of $1,960-$5,900, where a small practice is defined as three physicians and two impacted staff.”

  • CFOs Expect Higher Hospital Labor Costs As Staffing Shortages Loom
  • Six Characteristics of High-Value Primary Care Practices
  • CMS to Help Medicaid Reimburse for Maternal Opioid Misuse Care
  • California State Agency Claims $375,000 in Non-Compliant Medicaid Fees
  • Physician Shortages Drive Increases in Provider Compensation
  • Can Next Generation ACO Drive Patient Engagement?
  • CMS, CDC Add More than 5,000 Codes to ICD-10 Coding System
  • How Do Hospital Mergers Lower Costs, Drive Quality Improvement?
  • Health Insurers Increase Use of Value-Based Reimbursement
  • Patients Led to Private Plans to Boost Claims Reimbursement?
  • Geisinger Lowers Turnover for Healthcare Revenue Cycle Success
  • How Beverly Hospital Succeeds at Revenue Cycle Management
  • Telehealth Reimbursement Needed for its Growth, Advancement
  • Is Billing Some Patients at Hospital Chargemaster Rates Legal?
  • CMS Prepares Providers for End of ICD-10 Coding Flexibilities
  • Senators Ask for Help with Quality, Healthcare Price Transparency
  • Will Insurance Mergers Drive Up Health Insurance Premiums?
  • Medicare Wellness Visit Adoption Boosts Primary Care Revenue
  • How MACRA, MIPS Will Impact Critical Access Hospitals, FQHCs
  • Health Centers Face Post-ACA Revenue Cycle Management Issues
  • CMS Calls on Stakeholders for Pediatric APM Development Input
  • CMS: Successful April Medicare FFS ICD-10 End-to-End Testing
  • Chronic disease prevention programs get $212M from HHS
  • CMS Announces Next Generation ACO Model Open Door Forum
  • EHRs Still Disrupt Nursing Workflows, But Nurses Warming to Tech
  • Overcoming the Top Challenges of Claims Denial Management Audits
  • Revenue Cycle Management Outsourcing is Set to Expand
  • Revenue Cycle Management a Post-ICD-10 Implementation Focus
  • Stakeholders Want Greater MIPS Participation for Higher Rewards
  • 85% of Hospitals to See Part B Increase Despite 340B Payment Cuts
  • May 8: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Addressing Hospital Executives’ Supply Chain Management Gaps
  • CMS Targets Value-Based Purchasing, Drug Costs to Reduce Spending
  • CMS Shares New Qualified Entity Program Growth Developments
  • How Effective is the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program?
  • January 30: The Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Legality
  • CMS Proposes Change to Home Health Agencies CoP
  • AHA, FAH: ACA Repeal Could Cost Hospital Revenue Cycle Billions
  • OIG Identifies Several Quality Improvement Challenges at IHS
  • April 10: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • AMA Releases New MACRA Implementation Resources for Providers
  • CMS’s 3 September Steps to ICD-10 Implementation Readiness
  • 3 Hard Reimbursement Questions Physicians Are Afraid to Ask
  • Does Vermont have the least expensive healthcare costs?
  • How to Boost Ambulatory Revenue Cycle Management Performance
  • HHS Announces $685M Awards in Patient-Centered Clinician Aid
  • Physician-Sponsored Accountable Care Organizations Succeed
  • Value-Based Reimbursement Shift Slows, But CEOs Still Preparing
  • Benefits, Challenges of Value-Based Health IT Implementation
  • Clinical Documentation Improvement Solutions Up Provider Revenue
  • Potential Medicare Reimbursement Demo to Lower Part B Drug Prices
  • HHS Releases 2015 Final Physician Fee Schedule Rule
  • WEDI: ICD-10 Coding Guideline Negates Some Claim Audit Policies
  • Healthcare Providers Await Slashed Revenue Following ICD-10
  • NH Judge Rejects CMS FAQs Clarifying Medicaid DSH Payments
  • How Emergency Providers Can Adopt Alternative Payment Models
  • Greater Non-Physician Staffing Helps Healthcare Revenue Cycle
  • Beth Israel, Lahey Health Hospital Merger May Up Costs, MA AG Says
  • Post-Acute Care Can Help Accountable Care Organizations Save
  • Adoption of Value-Based Reimbursements Trends
  • Providers Expect Revenue, Productivity to Drop after ICD-10
  • How Can the Affordable Care Act Improve on Women’s Healthcare?
  • CMS Provides Clarity on $840M Quality Care and Cost Initiative
  • Prehabilitation Lowers Episode Costs Under Bundled Payment Models
  • CMS Unveils Medicare Quality Improvement Initiatives
  • CMS Final Rule Updates Inpatient Claims Reimbursement System
  • Slowing Employment Key to Reducing Healthcare Costs, Experts Argue
  • Target Prices to Control Prescription Drug Spending, AHA Advises
  • Group Purchasing Increases Healthcare Supply Chain Savings
  • Hospitals Oppose Further Medicare and Medicaid Cuts
  • Is Data Collection too Burdensome in CMS Final Payment Rule?
  • HHS Finalizes Solutions to Decrease Medicare Appeals Backlog
  • NOTICE Act Helps Beneficiaries Understand Healthcare Costs
  • Youth mental health services to receive $99M in HHS funding
  • CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner Steps Down
  • Credit Card On File Program Key To Patient Collections Success
  • GAO: Weak Medicare, Medicaid Provider Screening Allows Fraud
  • $100B Aftermath of Medicare Access, CHIP Reauthorization Act
  • CMS Contractor to Refund $6.9M in Medicare Outlier Payments
  • Family Physicians Slowly Embracing Value-Based Reimbursement
  • How can CMS Reform the Medicare Hospice Payment System?
  • Hospitals Lagging with Healthcare Cost Transformation Efforts
  • 4 Key Ways to Improve Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management
  • Examining Evolving Healthcare CIO Challenges
  • CMS Brings Integrated, Multi-Payer Claims Data Access to CPC+
  • CMS Cancels Home Health Groupings Model, $950M Reimbursement Cut
  • Medicare Fund for Hospital Care to Run Out Sooner Than Expected
  • Why HOPD Medicare Expenditures Need Equalized Payment Rates
  • Top 7 New Strategies for Revenue Cycle Management Excellence
  • Healthcare Revenue Cycle to Experience Significant Innovation
  • OIG: Medicare Contractor Erred in Two Reimbursement Claims
  • Medicare Advantage Average Payment Cut Hurts Beneficiaries
  • 72% of Medical Groups Oppose Mandatory Alternative Payment Models
  • AHA Backs Cardiac, Ortho Bundled Payments Delay Until 2018
  • November 13: Week That Was in Healthcare Fraud and Malpractice
  • Texas legislator asks Medicare to retract billing settlement
  • Lab Experts Help Providers Reduce Low-Value Resource Use, Costs
  • Hospitals to See More 340B Drug Pricing Program Oversight, Azar Says
  • Affordable Care Act Saved Medicare Beneficiaries $20 Billion
  • How a Cadillac Tax Repeal Affects Revenue Cycle Management
  • There are several parts of the process that are cheaper than previous thought. These include:

    Training – There are several reasons for train to have a lower costs. EHR adoption and meaningful use are often clumped together with ICD-10 training. Many of the materials can be downloaded for free and comprehensive training program costs range from $350 to $700.

    Software Upgrade – Many vendors are including ICD-10 upgrades in their annual updates for free. Furthermore, government incentive payments are helping physicians adopt new software solutions.

    End to End Testing – For smaller practices, vendors handle the testing and physician participation is at a minimum.

    Super Bill Conversation – Physicians that use the super bill conversions will have been upgrading their ICD-9 solutions frequently and making the jump to ICD-10 is not that much more involved.

    Productivity – A major driver in past reports on cost is the additional documentation requirements and associated reduction in productivity. However, this is based off of the risks of disruption for inpatient hospitals. New data shows that physician practices have progressed and the average time for implementation is one hour or less.

    Since the new estimates of the costs for ICD-10 preparation are much lower than originally estimated, the barriers to ICD-10 implementation are much less than originally projected. With proper coding, hospitals can boost revenue by ensuring that they claim for the complete value of their services.



    Join 30,000 of your peers and get free access to all webcasts and exclusive content

    Sign up for our free newsletter:

    Our privacy policy

    no, thanks

    Continue to site...